Trieste, lavoratori portuali a Lamorgese: “Tamponi gratis? No grazie, Green Pass va abolito”

Condividi!

A seguito del DL 139, ecco che esce una circolare del Ministero dell’Interno. Esso, vedendo i portuali in protesta ha evidentemente subodorato problemi all’orizzonte e ha ben pensato di proporre una misura evidentemente, a suo avviso, “conciliativa”: le aziende dovrebbero farsi carico del costo dei tamponi, per evitare assenze in comparti strategici. Raccomandano di sollecitare le imprese “affinché valutino di mettere a disposizione tamponi gratuiti” per quei dipendenti che risultassero sprovvisti di Green Pass.

Beh, ci sono alcune considerazioni importanti da fare, per noi: questa misura non può risolvere nulla, giacché non è certo il solo costo dei tamponi il problema, bensì le misure liberticide proposte; possiamo essere una spina nel fianco non da poco se solo ce ne rendiamo conto, e la cosa inizia a farsi evidente al Sistema; stanno tentando ogni carta prima di arrivare al ritiro di questa misura criminale: sta a noi tenere duro fino alla fine!

Ricordate: quello che sentite in TV è una cosa, la realtà è quasi sempre molto diversa. Chi vuole fingere che “andrà tutto bene” avrà ben presto da rimangiarsi le parole: abbiamo i numeri e la possibilità, per legge, di manifestare non solo nelle piazze ma anche e soprattutto con le azioni concrete che decidiamo di portare avanti nel quotidiano. Ognuno come può, ognuno coi suoi mezzi, non serve diventare eroi, basta ricordare di non essere servi. Forza e coraggio, è il nostro momento! Staff Corvelva

Condividi!

11 thoughts on “Trieste, lavoratori portuali a Lamorgese: “Tamponi gratis? No grazie, Green Pass va abolito”

  1. Vuoi scommettere che i sindacati… o meglio i servi del potere, tuoneranno contro i portuali…
    Scommettiamo?

    1. @Pippo CREDO CHE I SINDACATI ABBIANO CAPITO. Solo che non sanno come fare a dire al popolo che i sopravvissuti all’Olocausto hanno scritto a EMA (ad agosto) perché i sieri genici violano il Codice di Norimberga.

      I giornalisti lo sanno, ma stanno zitti. I militari lo sanno, ma tacciono. Le redazioni che ricevono la loro lettera, si guardano bene dal pubblicarla. Hanno tutti paura. Comunque, è già iniziata Norimberga 2 —> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oh2Sj_QpZOA

      1. Min (45:34) Mr President, Anthony Fauci, did he ever once mention to You that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was genetically manipulating coronaviruses?

        Min (45:41) Well, no, he didn’t. And you know, Anthony has been in government for many many years. He is a bureaucratic kind of a guy, a very great promoter, I give him an A+ as a promoter, and a probably a C or a D as a doctor.
        Min (45:55) We now know from e-mails that have been released under the Freedom of Information Act that he was getting his advice from the likes of Peter Dashing, a Wuhan collaborator. At the same time, he was telling you that this was a natural virus. While, at the same time, behind the scenes, in e-mails, he was having discussions about whether this might have been genetically manipulated.

        Min (46:22) DOES THAT SHOCK YOU?

        Min (46:23) Well, he was dealing with them, certainly. And … my thing was a little bit different. I just wanted to stop it. Uh … whether it developed one way of the other, I just wanted to stop it.
        Min (46:35) But it is important to know where it came from. It is extremely important to know how it developed.
        Min (46:40) Fauci was dealing with them and I guess they were even making payments for certain kinds of research. And I ended that too. I stopped that when we found out about that, he was doing that during the Obama years. And when I found out about it, I said “Can you imagine that the United States is making payments to a Chinese lab? So, just that on his face didn’t make sense, but I stopped that.

        Min (47:03) THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DID HIT “pause” ON GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH, THOUGH. AND THAT WAS LIFTED UNDER YOUR WATCH. —> WHY DID YOU ALLOW THE GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH TO CONTINUE?

        Min (47:15) Well, I think probably people that worked for me looked at it and at one point they might have done that. But ultimately what we did was we shut it off. We shut the whole thing off. And we stopped making payments that were approved much earlier than our administration.
        Min (47:31) Do you regret now not paying closer attention? I mean, this gain of function research is extremely risky. You know, banned under the Obama administration, and then kick-started in 2017 under your watch.

        Min (47:43) Yeah,… no, I think we’ve done an INCREDIBLE JOB between the vaccine and between all the operation warp speed. I think we did a great job … and people are now starting to see what a great job we did.

      2. TUTTO QUESTO DA METTERE INSIEME ALL’INTERVISTA DI REINER FUELLMICH A DAVID MARTIN.

        David Martin dimostra che SONO 20 ANNI CHE CI SONO QUEI BREVETTI, nulla di nuovo con il SARS_COV-2
        La pandemia è stata pianificata:

        min (59:25) DOMANDA DI REINER FUELLMICH
        «…. Doesn’t that also mean that if you take the entirety of the evidence, then this is a tool (the coronavirus and the vaccines), this is a tool and the interest of DARPA in creating a biological weapon out of this. This is a tool for everything else that latches onto this… including population control, for example?….»

        min (1:00:01) RISPOSTA DI DAVID MARTIN
        «…. Because, the fact of the matter is, this was seen as a highly malleable bio-weapon. There is no question that by 2005 it was unquestionabilly a weapon of choice. And the illusion that we continue to, unfortunatly, see very well many people get trapped in, is conversations whether we have a vaccine for a virus. The fact of the matter is we are not.
        We are injecting a spike protein mRNA sequence, which is a computer simulation, it is not derived from nature. It is a computer simulation of a sequence, which has been known and patended for years …»

        Tratto da: https://www.cnbsnews.live/documentaries/dr-david-e-martin-explains-how-this-pandemic-was-planned//dr-david-e-martin-explains-how-this-pandemic-was-planned/

      3. Min (29:36) My favourite quote of this pandemic was a statement made in 2015 by Peter Dashing. The statement that was made by Peter in 2015 reported in the National Academy of Press Publication (Feb 12th 2016) and I am quoting:

        “We need to increase public understanding of the NEED FOR MEDICAL COUNTER-MEASURES, such a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the Media, and the economics will follow the hype. WE NEED TO USE THAT HYPE TO OUR ADVANTAGE to get to the real issues. INVESTORS will respond if they see PROFIT at the end of the process”.

        https://www.unite4truth.com/post/reiner-fuellmich-david-martin-patent-data-destroys-entire-covid-19-government-narrative-video

  2. @ PIPPO Ti è chiaro ora lo schema?
    Se serve fare una traduzione delle parti in inglese, “cut & paste” e “Google Translate”.

    Chiaro a chi dobbiamo la “Corona” che ci è stata posta sulla testa? Non gli si vedono i baffi, perché se li rasa (per ora).

Rispondi

© 2019-2021 Stopcensura.online | Tutti i diritti riservati. Le pubblicazioni sul sito web non hanno alcun carattere di periodicità.
%d blogger hanno fatto clic su Mi Piace per questo: